MSI MS-16GF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE60 2PE
MotherboardMSI MS-16GF  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140813
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 18:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 178
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 250
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1107) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 6.09
3% 8.81 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.39
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 60 68 71 72 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.5% Above average
Read 221
Write 150
Mixed 144
SusWrite 66.6
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 37.1
114% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 98.5
82% 116 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 81%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
180GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 84 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 110
Write 116
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 83.7
60% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston 9905469-137.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GF Builds (Compare 462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback