| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK X512FL |
| Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190619 |
| Uptime | 4 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 23 '20 at 10:45 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | HKG-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
| CPU Throttled | 90% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
|
42.3%
Average
|
41% 76.8 Pts
|
42% 337 Pts
|
26% 423 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1FBE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
|
3.96%
Terrible
|
3% 7.58 fps
|
6% 6.51 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$66
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 741 639 729 787 735 696 MB/s
|
159%
Outstanding
|
208% 929 MB/s
|
157% 55.7 MB/s
|
225% 356 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
58.7%
Above average
|
71% 24.8 GB/s
|
10% 3.5 GB/s
|
17% 230 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL Builds (Compare 177 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_X512FL
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples | 118x |
| GeForce MX250NvidiaBench 14%, 8,806 samples | 59x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $66 |