HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '20 at 06:25
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 73.2 1-Core 39.9 2-Core 66.3 41% 59.8 Pts	4-Core 95 8-Core 106 13% 101 Pts	64-Core 96.4 6% 96.4 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210 3,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 2180) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.81 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 0.47 1% 1.32 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128 128GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 200Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 127 129 129 129 MB/s Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.6% Above average	Read 255 Write 133 Mixed 138 SusWrite 128 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 24.4 112% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 55.2 70% 125 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 76%
AI Mass Storage 32GB 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 30GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 9 9 7.2 9 9.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	5.33% Terrible	Read 17.3 Write 14.8 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 8.6 14% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.33% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 40GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.7 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 94.2 42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	53x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	37x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	26x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	90x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	20x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	17x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:01 98 K1N7HK-HYC 48GBUnknownBench 19%, 8 samples	6x
ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 38GBUnknownBench 20%, 147 samples	5x
ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 38GBUnknownBench 19%, 31 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $137

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16