Emachines ET1862

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmachines ET1862  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines ET1862
Memory3.6 GB free of 7 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 10:36
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$99
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 116
50% 83 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 160
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
8.93% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 13.6
8% 12.4 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 9.07
Splatting 16.2
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.93%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 218
Write 164
Mixed 175
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 23.4
77% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 176
138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Hitachi HDT721050SLA360 500GB-$66
302GB free
Firmware: ST3OA31B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 79
Write 29.5
Mixed 43.7
38% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 99U5471-020.A00LF 0198 ACR128X64D3U1333C9 7GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET1862 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1862

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback