Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics8.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '16 at 04:23
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 145-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Memory 42.9
1-Core 17.9
2-Core 24.1
21% 28.3 Pts
4-Core 29.7
8-Core 31.3
4% 30.5 Pts
64-Core 34.9
2% 34.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.65% Terrible
Lighting 9.93
Reflection 9.69
Parallax 12.6
8% 10.7 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 7.47
Splatting 13.7
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X212 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 267
Write 234
Mixed 251
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 16.1
83% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 58.4
DQ Mixed 15.7
20% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HTS541260H9AT00 60GB
49GB free
Firmware: HP2OA23C Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 33.2
Mixed 33.2
26% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.11
45% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF Adata DDR3 1866G 2OZ Adata DDR3 1866G 2OZ 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback