Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.1 GB free of 15.9941 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '20 at 06:00
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,166
104% 876 Pts
64-Core 1,734
107% 1,734 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$387
EVGA(3842 3070) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 131
Parallax 129
113% 133 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 120
Splatting 96.3
101% 128 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,983
Write 1,977
Mixed 2,336
1,830% 2,432 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 45.4
7,800% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 131
1,165% 123 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 96%
Qemu HARDDISK 100GB
93GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,491
Write 2,112
Mixed 1,634
1,312% 1,745 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 29.9
5,321% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 119
1,132% 128 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
189% Outstanding
MC Read 76.2
MC Write 79.3
MC Mixed 74.7
219% 76.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 36.8
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 189%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback