Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook 8540w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1521
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130913
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '20 at 06:53
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 620 9,076 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Memory 64.4 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 129 54% 91.2 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 166 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800M 1,209 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1521) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	3.48% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 5.85 Parallax 1.66 4% 3.92 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 3.03 Splatting 3.7 4% 4.39 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.48% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB 15,968 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 51 47 44 34 52 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.9% Below average	Read 220 Write 169 Mixed 87.2 SusWrite 47.2 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 12.6 55% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 25.3 DQ Mixed 9.3 32% 75.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.9% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 10.2 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	228x
Quadro FX 1800MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,209 samples	64x
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples	45x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28