Asus P7P55 WS SUPERCOMPUTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7P55 WS SUPERCOMPUTER  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '15 at 08:12
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 183
63% 138 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 469
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3006) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1014.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 68.3
40% 50.7 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 52.8
Splatting 43.1
35% 42.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68% Good
Read 455
Write 338
Mixed 295
80% 362 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 14.7
93% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 65.8
DQ Mixed 14.5
20% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68%
Great: 113%
H/W RAID5 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0956 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 150
Write 13.6
Mixed 24.6
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.15
40% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 63%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
770GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 98
Mixed 102
74% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.22
99% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
247GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 159
Write 136
Mixed 117
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.24
68% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 113%
Typical P7P55 WS SUPERCOMPUTER Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7P55 WS SUPERCOMPUTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback