Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '20 at 09:13
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: QEMU Virtual version 2.5+ 124 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26% Poor	Memory 36.9 1-Core 44.2 2-Core 84.7 32% 55.3 Pts	4-Core 89 8-Core 88 12% 88.5 Pts	64-Core 83.1 5% 83.1 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 73%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 69GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 229 170 153 218 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 356 Write 308 Mixed 292 SusWrite 187 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 6.1 20% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 17.4 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 11.4 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 217 18% 217 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16