Lenovo 10ASS01U00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10ASS01U00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150423
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 31 '20 at 21:09
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 170
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 313
41% 306 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 3098) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 5.69
Parallax 5.97
3% 5.06 fps
MRender 7.05
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 6.91
4% 5.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 70 93 104 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 106
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 82.7
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
242GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 102 103 103 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 82.7
Write 84.8
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 97.9
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
172GB free
Firmware: HP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 103 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 125
Write 71.8
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 102
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030MN68F9F1600 1315 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback