Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime21.7 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 06:26
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 195
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 510
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 426.0
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44% Average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 51.1
44% 54.1 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 54.2
Splatting 48.3
45% 55.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 305 287 260 246 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 376
Write 295
Mixed 295
SusWrite 265
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 28.4
110% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 293
218% 292 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 99%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
12GB free
Firmware: UF450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 334
Write 302
Mixed 180
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 10
50% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 76.7
DQ Mixed 14.5
34% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
Seagate FreeAgent 2TB
250GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 38 39 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 37
Mixed 27
SusWrite 37.8
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 19%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
58GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 82 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 96.5
Write 108
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 81.5
116% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M1A2400C14 029E CMK16GX4M1A2400C16 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 19
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback