Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H77TN-00

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H77TN-00 (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130221
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '20 at 15:11
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 80.9 2-Core 160 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 401 42% 339 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30% Poor	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 29.8 30% 32.2 fps	MRender 35.1 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 34.5 29% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 mSATA 128GB-$80 987 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231200 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 215 205 209 217 217 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.1% Above average	Read 230 Write 218 Mixed 154 SusWrite 211 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 30.1 4K Mixed 18.6 64% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 111 103% 159 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 86%
SanDisk SDSSDA120G 120GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 112GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 6.5 6.7 6.8 6.5 6.5 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 36.3 Write 26.2 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 6.7 33% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 7.7 795% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 10.4 DQ Write 20 DQ Mixed 9.6 1,045% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 59%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00RKKA0 1TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 386GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.2 7.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 35.8 Write 36.5 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 7.1 35% 27 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 23%
WDC WD10 01FALS-403AA0 1TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 93GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7 6.9 6.9 6.8 6.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 39 Write 31 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 6.9 33% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 78% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 21%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 3.5TB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 39.8 Write 36 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 38.9 49% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 20%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00M4B0 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 601GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 36 Mixed 32 SusWrite 7.1 36% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 20%
ST330006 51AS 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 532GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.3 7.2 7 7.2 7.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 38.2 Mixed 31 SusWrite 7.3 37% 29 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 1,963 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.1% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H77TN-00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77TN-00

CPU
Core i5-3570TIntelBench 67%, 210 samples	1x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1x

SSD
INTENSO 512GBBench 75%, 2,578 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,963 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $296	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350