Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '16 at 01:09
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 121 2-Core 244 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 802 80% 650 Pts	64-Core 996 62% 996 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Lighting 78.8 Reflection 77.2 Parallax 72.5 64% 76.2 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 72.8 Splatting 73.2 59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 355GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4412 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 627 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 58 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 78 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3919588546	110% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 413 Mixed 420 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 42.1 166% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 105 136% 247 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 134%
Corsair Force GT 90GB-$96 764 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 7071609 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 79731772899303 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2373 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 519 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 27 53 64427982875 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7071609 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7071609 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7071609 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11411 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10502 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10502 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9485	59.6% Above average	Read 478 Write 111 Mixed 180 56% 256 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 95.5 4K Mixed 17.9 106% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 18.6 DQ Write 92.1 DQ Mixed 32.6 32% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 208501232 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 7138 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 54 146092424707 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16118 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2349 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 51 454295579 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 281 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 40 40 121047 (C2) HDA temperature 27 49 64424509467 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 93114890985778 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -37106593927876 (F2) Unknown 100 253 37856552590126	96.8% Outstanding	Read 131 Write 207 Mixed 135 118% 158 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.41 110% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSA.8FADG BLS4G4D240FSA.8FADG 16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 40.5 MC Write 41.9 MC Mixed 36.4 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 22.2 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 61.1 65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	468x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	109x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	48x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	85x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	75x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	46x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	43x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GBCorsair $97Bench 83%, 3,926 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	9x
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $978

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16