PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
Memory | 6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131209 |
Uptime | 6.6 Days |
Run Date | Feb 04 '20 at 01:29 |
Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 300 308 310 287 301 MB/s
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 KHX1600C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 686x |
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 598x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 316x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 142x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $88Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 86x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $275 |