Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '20 at 03:14
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 225
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 603
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.30.04
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 20.2
13% 31.6 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 20.5
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M9PeGN 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 231 236 253 262 262 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,781
Write 1,038
Mixed 1,044
SusWrite 283
229% 1,036 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 68.8
229% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 598
500% 722 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 195%
Great: 211%
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160
447GB free
Firmware: MU01.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 135 73 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 479
Write 396
Mixed 363
SusWrite 137
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 31
120% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 104
89% 136 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71%
Great: 95%
Hkvsn ESSD-T200/240G 256GB
172GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 305 187 110 77 133 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
Read 368
Write 271
Mixed 276
SusWrite 186
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 15.4
58% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 69.8
DQ Write 22
DQ Mixed 22
22% 37.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 55%
Innostor Ext. HDD 250GB
48GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 46 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 53
Mixed 38
SusWrite 45.3
63% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 149%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB
1GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.3
Write 18
Mixed 15.8
22% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Kingston 9905624-013.A00G 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 27.6
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 23.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback