Toshiba Satellite C55Dt-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55Dt-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF50 06F7
Memory1.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151002
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '20 at 04:36
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
40% Below average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 29.5
2-Core 60.2
34% 50 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 96.9
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 70.9
4% 70.9 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Toshiba(1179 F845) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 3.47
0% 2.51 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 3.78
3% 3.04 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
636GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 86 73 87 74 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 80.3
Write 83.3
Mixed 29
SusWrite 75.6
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Kingston TSB16D3LFS1KBG/2G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 5.9
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55Dt-C Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55Dt-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback