ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10AF0017MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 10AF0017MX (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191221
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '20 at 18:34
Run Duration	108 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460S 10,941 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 170 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 309 44% 323 Pts	64-Core 305 19% 305 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 309B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 6.35 Parallax 6.59 0% 4.34 fps	MRender 9.38 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 7.65 5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 239GB free (System drive) Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 62 44 46 65 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 97.7 Write 101 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 58.1 59% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston 99U5469-055.A00LF 8GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 16.8 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback