Lenovo 10AF0017MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10AF0017MX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191221
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '20 at 18:34
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 170
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 309
44% 323 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 309B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 6.59
0% 4.34 fps
MRender 9.38
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.65
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 62 44 46 65 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 97.7
Write 101
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 58.1
59% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston 99U5469-055.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback