Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 12:44
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 81.8
46% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 226
24% 189 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
MSI(1462 2793) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 15
Parallax 16.4
11% 15 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 17.4
12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct240bx5 0 240GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 119 9.8 12 72 6.8 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.8% Poor
Read 227
Write 170
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 63
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 10.9
54% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST1000LX 015-1U7172 1TB
222GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 101 100 91 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 72
Write 103
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 93.2
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
122GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 50.1
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 44.6
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 40%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
605GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 109 109 107 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 140
Write 150
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 106
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
1TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 148 153 154 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 144
Write 149
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 150
168% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.5% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback