Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 L 640 2,030 User benchmarks, average bench 41% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Memory 53.9 1-Core 58.6 2-Core 89.8 41% 67.4 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 134 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.35% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.38 0% 0.41 fps	MRender 0.57 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.7 0% 0.52 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.35% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GCSJ 128GB 1,192 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJLA0201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 157 168 175 158 179 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	25% Poor	Read 96.9 Write 38.7 Mixed 99.2 SusWrite 168 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 12.2 32% 9.6 MB/s	DQ Read 10.9 DQ Write 14.8 DQ Mixed 8.9 8% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3020EF48E8W1333 80CE M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1334, 1334 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	21% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16