HP EliteBook 840 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2216
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '20 at 09:17
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 167
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 232
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 2216) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 7.23
Parallax 6.62
4% 6.41 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 5
Splatting 11.3
7% 8.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A200806
SusWrite @10s intervals: 509 524 546 552 559 562 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 590
Write 536
Mixed 263
SusWrite 542
108% 483 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 27.4
100% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 419
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 136
164% 288 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: AX0U1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 106
Write 109
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 111
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 18.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G2 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback