ADD TO PC
BUILD

____________________________

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	__ ______________________________ (all builds)
Motherboard	__ ____
Memory	3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190820
Uptime	10.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '20 at 00:41
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Not Available 50 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 112 2-Core 207 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 621 62% 507 Pts	64-Core 949 59% 949 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.2% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 122 Parallax 102 88% 111 fps	MRender 148 Gravity 109 Splatting 87 91% 115 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1006 256GB 3,914 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10110006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 350 342 343 330 335 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,300 Write 1,325 Mixed 1,174 SusWrite 361 233% 1,040 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 53 179% 64.7 MB/s	DQ Read 850 DQ Write 883 DQ Mixed 782 611% 838 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 217%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 756GB free Firmware: MX4OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 147 149 149 149 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 138 Write 146 Mixed 31 SusWrite 147 83% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U6S8ME-8X 2x8GB 624 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.9% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 22.2 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 18.7 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback