AMD AOPW-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAMD AOPW-PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD AOPW-PLUS
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '20 at 00:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 6328
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 64
1-Core 62
2-Core 125
50% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 314
31% 254 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 72.4
Parallax 87.7
56% 76.3 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 57.9
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 140 143 162 151 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 150
Write 138
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 143
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
28GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 15.5
Mixed 14.3
SusWrite 16.1
22% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
97% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030ME68F9F1600 RMR5030MJ68F9F1600 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.7% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AOPW-PLUS Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: AMD AOPW-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback