Intel powered classmate PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardIntel powered classmate PC  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '20 at 20:48
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 73
1-Core 28.6
2-Core 56.1
37% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 55.9
8-Core 56.7
8% 56.3 Pts
64-Core 56.8
4% 56.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 9997) 233MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.77
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.66 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.91 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST250LM0 04 HN-M250MBB 250GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 42 42 48 51 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 9.4
Write 42.7
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 42
24% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GMB10028SOX8191333 1x1GB
1 of 4 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.9% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 1.8
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical powered classmate PC Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel powered classmate PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback