Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '20 at 00:44
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3235
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 251
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 1007
92% 770 Pts
64-Core 2,029
126% 2,029 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 90%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Apple(106B 0206) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1710 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20.01.04
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 78
54% 69 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 49.8
47% 59 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7174
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,185
Write 1,846
Mixed 2094
456% 2,042 MB/s
4K Read 163
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 68
420% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 1,026
DQ Mixed 934
712% 956 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 80%
Inateck 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 377 318 255 220 295 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 4x8GB
4 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 35
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 9.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback