Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 8935G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire 8935G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer SM80-MV
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '20 at 15:20
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9000-$121
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 46.9
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 54.9
29% 44.6 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 113
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 019F) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.51 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.44%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$99
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 178 195 208 215 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49% Average
Read 222
Write 220
Mixed 198
SusWrite 203
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 21.6
68% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 139
105% 142 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 49%
Great: 108%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
440GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 72 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 43
Mixed 30
SusWrite 71.6
36% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 8935G Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 8935G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $121
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback