Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '20 at 21:50
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 137
58% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 203
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.7
4% 5.05 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 84 101 105 107 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 113
Mixed 72
SusWrite 94.4
70% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.7
229% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 79%
Samsung G2 Portable 320GB
280GB free, PID 6032
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 38.9
Write 29.9
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 41.2
48% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.7
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $71
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback