PC M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M5A97 R2.0
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 14:39
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 118
56% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 222
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
EVGA(3842 3658) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 26.9
18% 22.9 fps
MRender 29.1
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 24.3
21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1222A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 364 353 377 384 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 451
Write 374
Mixed 342
SusWrite 318
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 13.2
94% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 60.1
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 21.3
52% 103 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 86%
Hua721010kla330 EIT 1TB
852GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 82.1
Write 77.3
Mixed 48
SusWrite 82.1
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
32GB free, PID 5590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 60 25 24 29 32 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 126
Write 60.4
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 35.9
92% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.6
176% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 13.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 11.4
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: PC M5A97 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $192
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback