Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory1 GB free of 3.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090825
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '20 at 15:39
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GHA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 70.7
38% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 71.4
8-Core 71.6
10% 71.5 Pts
64-Core 71.1
4% 71.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 3048) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.58 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.65
1% 0.68 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GB0250EAFYK 250GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 9.6 10 23 15 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 94.5
Write 16.7
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 13.8
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 8JTF12864AZ-1G4F1 39GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $78
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback