Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140829
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '20 at 06:08
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 142
60% 99 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 502
46% 383 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.40.20.10
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 36.7
25% 31.4 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 32
23% 27.3 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OWC Aura SSD 960GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 468 464 522 562 566 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.1% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 579
Mixed 468
SusWrite 510
115% 508 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 29.4
96% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 215
164% 220 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 96%
OWC Envoy 500GB
119GB free, PID 338a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 215 218 223 224 218 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 295
Write 222
Mixed 230
SusWrite 216
317% 240 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 13.9
1,069% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 18.9
DQ Mixed 16.1
1,244% 16.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 142%
Great: 161%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x45424A3430454738424657422D4A532D4620 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 34.8
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback