Biostar TZ68K+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar TZ68K+  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120709
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '20 at 19:33
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 559
63% 493 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.8% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 47.9
48% 54.2 fps
MRender 45.3
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 51.2
41% 49.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
THU 120G 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0719A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 168 64 43 77 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 400
Write 343
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 93.2
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 0.6
26% 7.97 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 26
32% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 84%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
683GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 118 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 66
Write 113
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 117
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
195% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16JTF25664AZ-1G1F1 Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 16JTF25664AZ-1G1F1 10GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.6% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TZ68K+ Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TZ68K+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback