TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '20 at 05:54
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 156
2-Core 310
95% 180 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 1,041
100% 825 Pts
64-Core 1,467
91% 1,467 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 93.9%
 Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Asus(1043 866A)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 216
Parallax 224
163% 213 fps
MRender 248
Gravity 210
Splatting 140
157% 200 fps
Poor: 128% ↑
This bench: 149%
 Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 1TB-$500
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 392 406 407 409 409 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 397
Mixed 329
SusWrite 402
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 39
132% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 163
128% 178 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 94.3%
 Great: 108%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
3.5TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 447 455 456 457 456 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 450
Mixed 437
SusWrite 452
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 59
193% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 199
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑
This bench: 117%
 Great: 133%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
56GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 47 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 51.8
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 49.1
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 30.8%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 16GF2X08QFHH36-135-K 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 29.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 29.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 72.3%
 Great: 126%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD  $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples1,928x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples1,346x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD  $375Bench 88%, 197,342 samples1,117x
GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia  $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples1,112x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia  $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples881x
RTX 3090Nvidia  $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples615x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples852x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $100Bench 310%, 455,997 samples712x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $148Bench 297%, 331,647 samples423x
RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples435x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair  $120Bench 89%, 144,399 samples189x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples157x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback