Lenovo 20ER000KUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20ER000KUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ER000KUS
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '20 at 15:50
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 509
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M3000M
Legend(17AA 222F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 30.7
28% 33.2 fps
MRender 43.4
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 45
33% 39.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 696 649 643 742 758 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 2,561
Write 323
Mixed 762
SusWrite 658
234% 1,076 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 31.9
114% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 377
304% 444 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 199%
Great: 199%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback