Today's hottest deals

ACER Aspire M1641

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemACER Aspire M1641  (all builds)
MotherboardACER MCP73VE
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '20 at 19:48
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6600-$90
SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 23.4
2-Core 39
28% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 41.7
8-Core 45.1
6% 43.4 Pts
64-Core 44.9
3% 44.9 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7050 / nForce 620i
Acer(1025 0137) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.8
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.05% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 0.06
0% 0.09 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.05%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 80GB-$33
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 28 27 43 45 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 51.7
Write 46.7
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 39.2
31% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 32%
Samsung Mighty Drive 1GB
0GB free, PID 1a23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.9 2.7 2.8 3 2.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Read 10
Write 1.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.8
4% 4.12 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.12% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.33 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2
5% 1.77 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M1641 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: ACER Aspire M1641

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback