HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory29.2 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '20 at 12:53
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 156
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 544
54% 440 Pts
64-Core 1,214
75% 1,214 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 26.6
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 32.6
22% 27.8 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 22.3
23% 29.5 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
739GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 248 247 248 247 248 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.1% Good
Read 258
Write 247
Mixed 233
SusWrite 247
56% 246 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 30.5
103% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 196
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
620GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 39 39 38 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 36.7
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 38.3
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-CH9 ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback