Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20079

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20079  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '17 at 07:05
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 112
54% 85 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 154
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 397A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.840.7.1000
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.19
Parallax 1.94
1% 1.88 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.3
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$40
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 70.8
Mixed 73.8
53% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.14
45% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 50%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 500GB
203GB free, PID 61f3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 28.9
Write 20.3
Mixed 23.7
30% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.89
4K Write 5.61
4K Mixed 3.56
338% 5.36 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20079 Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20079

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback