Today's hottest deals

Asus F1A55-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120930
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '20 at 22:35
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 79.8
41% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 81.7
8-Core 81
11% 81.3 Pts
64-Core 77.9
5% 77.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.25
4% 4.31 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 59 124 146 86 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.3% Poor
Read 193
Write 182
Mixed 152
SusWrite 120
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 11.4
40% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 17.3
DQ Mixed 11
10% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LE Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback