Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision M4700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell Precision M4700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 082H3V
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '20 at 08:03
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 95
2-Core 148
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 394
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.7% Below average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 51.2
Parallax 61.5
42% 54.8 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 46.3
35% 42.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 291 297 275 283 220 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 401
Write 307
Mixed 248
SusWrite 273
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 17.2
61% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 130
110% 167 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 73%
Kingston RBUSMS180S3128GJ 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: SBFK61D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 66 65 65 66 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.3% Average
Read 241
Write 223
Mixed 205
SusWrite 79.6
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 23.4
89% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 43.8
60% 113 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 80%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$40
492GB free
Firmware: DEMG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 78 78 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 78.1
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.9
366% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 65%
SSK SHE088 500GB
264GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 97
Write 99.5
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 107
114% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B5173BH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4700 Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback