Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-H DDR3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H DDR3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H DDR3-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '20 at 14:39
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$44
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 215
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 318
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 57.6
56% 64.9 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 63.4
53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 104 93 115 116 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 105
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion 80GB
10GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 36.7
Write 35.8
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 35.2
24% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 24%
Seagate Expansion Desk 500GB
404GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 119 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 127
Write 125
Mixed 68
SusWrite 120
147% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04CB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H DDR3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback