HP Z400_v2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z400_v2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory13.7 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMar 08 '20 at 20:59
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3680-$180
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 169
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 514
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.58
Parallax 3.44
4% 4.09 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.34 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC8110C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 210 212 212 212 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.3% Above average
Read 209
Write 230
Mixed 185
SusWrite 208
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 20.4
67% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 135
115% 169 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 101%
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB
67GB free
Firmware: DXM01D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 151 151 150 152 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.8% Very poor
Read 151
Write 162
Mixed 149
SusWrite 151
35% 153 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 3.4
11% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
44GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 191 191 195 193 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 116
Write 91
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 193
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8A-PB ID:80 CE M378B5173EB0-YK0 ID:80 CE M378B5173QH0-YK0 50GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.6% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 10
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400_v2 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP Z400_v2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback