Today's hottest deals

Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 09 '20 at 03:57
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 393
53% 396 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 108
Parallax 99.4
83% 103 fps
MRender 97.3
Gravity 94.5
Splatting 102
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ph4-ce24 0 240GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F/W:
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 3.9 65 54 5.5 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 436
Write 230
Mixed 192
SusWrite 35.4
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.4
4% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
336GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 174 168 166 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 128
Mixed 29
SusWrite 168
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
259GB free
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 150 149 141 145 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 148
Write 147
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 146
83% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback