Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 10 '20 at 05:50
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 195
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 397
55% 407 Pts
64-Core 411
26% 411 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.4% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 50
Parallax 41.7
48% 50.3 fps
MRender 44.5
Gravity 51
Splatting 50.2
40% 48.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c89
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 355 367 369 285 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 417
Write 360
Mixed 339
SusWrite 309
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 29.6
111% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 191
142% 183 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
67GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 112
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
44GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 76
Write 75.8
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 70.8
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Dial 32GB
29GB free, PID 5599
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 2.3 6.7 2.7 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 4.8
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 3.5
13% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.4
209% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
22GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 12 14 13 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 10
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 12.9
19% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 3.6
192% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD48G240081 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 23.9
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback