Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16GA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE60 0NC/GE60 0ND
MotherboardMSI MS-16GA  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121218
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateMar 11 '20 at 09:25
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 156
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 211
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
MSI(1462 10C7) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Lighting 8.23
Reflection 7.46
Parallax 9.31
7% 8.34 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 9.63
Splatting 10.6
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU700 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B170428a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 56 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 457
Write 422
Mixed 380
SusWrite 71
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 22.8
84% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 78.5
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 88.4
96% 153 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 82%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 23.1
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 24.9
34% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 830B M2S4G64CB8HG4N-DI 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GA Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback