Acer Aspire X3470

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire X3470  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X3470
Memory0.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '20 at 01:24
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 33.6
2-Core 61.2
34% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 56.3
8-Core 62.2
8% 59.2 Pts
64-Core 66.8
4% 66.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6370D
Acer(1025 061D) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 2.19
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.78 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 2.17
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 55 66 37 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 88.5
Write 79.7
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 69.2
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.19% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 0.2
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.19%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3470 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback