Today's hottest deals

HP 280 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 280 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B34
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '20 at 02:54
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 421
56% 418 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1264 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.50.02
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 55.5
48% 58.6 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 54
40% 48.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 88 92 103 101 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 124
Write 119
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 93.8
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
19GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 5.7 4.9 5.6 4.8 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 6
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 16.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 280 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback