Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 85.9 1-Core 85.4 2-Core 125 62% 98.7 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 160 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 1.31 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.76 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 3.39 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 444 Write 372 Mixed 9.2 60% 275 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.3 24% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 9905428-043.A00LF 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.8 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.6 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	9x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	6x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	6x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	4x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	3x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
THNSNF128GCSS 128GBToshibaBench 68%, 2,061 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 0443 RMT3170EB68E9W1600 8GBHynixBench 47%, 21 samples	6x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 141 samples	5x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	1x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $35

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16