TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus FX503VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus FX503VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX503VM
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 15:52
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 198
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 393
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 75.4%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 154E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 53.4
46% 57.8 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 59.7
47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 46.1%
 Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$38
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,591
Write 720
Mixed 842
231% 1,051 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 74.4
250% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 933
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 891
661% 875 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
138GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 320 385 392 398 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 393
Mixed 386
SusWrite 357
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 41.6
128% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 269
222% 320 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 95.7%
 Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 8325 GSLG42F-18---------- 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 24
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 23
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 77.6%
 Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical FX503VM Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus FX503VM

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples210x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples201x
GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples410x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples1x
SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples68x
SD9SN8W128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 3,521 samples47x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples45x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples79x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples69x
76.D305G.D390B 1x16GBUnknownBench 41%, 6,956 samples25x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback