Acer Nitro N50-110

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-110  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-110
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191009
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 15 '20 at 14:25
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 76.6
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 818
85% 685 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.7% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 24.1
21% 26.4 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 33.5
26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
200GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 169 145 158 133 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 293
Write 259
Mixed 254
SusWrite 164
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 28
93% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 38.8
DQ Mixed 28.9
23% 31.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
619GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 129 139 155 162 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 148
Mixed 106
SusWrite 147
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
252% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 109%
HGST HDN 724030ALE640 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 137 137 137 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.5% Above average
Read 136
Write 146
Mixed 32
SusWrite 136
149% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 35.8
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 36.5
48% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-110 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Acer Nitro N50-110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback