Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '20 at 16:52
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 116
55% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 244
29% 224 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8481) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.5% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 53.9
34% 44.4 fps
MRender 52
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 35.8
36% 45.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 78 77 77 77 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 384
Write 365
Mixed 294
SusWrite 76.4
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 36.6
126% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 40.5
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 52.1
44% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 118%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
377GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 76
Write 72
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 87.7
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 65%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
574GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 77 77 77 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 74.1
Write 67.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 76.9
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3P16002G OCZ3P16002G OCZ3P16002G OCZ3P16002G 8GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback