Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star B450M PRO-VDH MAX (MS-7A38)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '20 at 20:20
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 641
67% 535 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
MSI(1462 7A38) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 30.4
18% 23.5 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 23.9
18% 21.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston USNS8180S3512GJ 512GB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 118 115 76 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 400
Write 393
Mixed 310
SusWrite 94.8
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 3.5
78% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 89.4
DQ Write 33.2
DQ Mixed 19.7
26% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 28.1
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 24.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback