Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '20 at 14:54
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$62
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 195
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 296
40% 296 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7.72
5% 7.96 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 5.63
Splatting 9.83
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200S610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 196 201 209 189 203 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 460
Write 312
Mixed 241
SusWrite 203
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 9.3
108% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 88.9
123% 223 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P26KC4U1-BBOS 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.2
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback